Public finances of international public goods (methodology)

In international relations based on the coexistence of independent sovereign nations, the possibility of supplementing article by a country is declining as the internationalization advances, and, in these circumstances, it is essential to conduct studies on how international public goods must be provided because of their importance is growing. Although there are many entities that provide international public goods, the main entity of the state / government, which provides international public goods through its activities.

The state / government is a mechanism for providing public goods, so that governments must take responsibility ultimately their citizens for the provision of international public goods, which are a kind of public good.

International Public Goods are diverse, if the manner of their performance should be studied after their classification according to their characteristics. Excellent research on the classification has been carried out from the aspect of the economy.

The provision of public goods is determined politically, after all, unlike the market, therefore the studies of international relations are also needed concerning the provision of international public goods to reveal how governments act in accordance with relations . It is possible to consider that the current situation was created by the interconnection of three elements: the limits of the State / State as a mechanism for providing public goods for its citizens, the common conscience based on the understanding that the Government / the State is insufficient, and the consciousness of being citizens of the world beyond the first two elements.

The question that will be supported more than anything else is how to share the burden for the provision of international public goods for which there should be a standard. Regarding international relations, where there is no solidarity, the principle of capacity to pay or the principle of benefits, which are both based on the principle of equity, should be applied.

It should be noted that in the case of malfeasance in the international public, there is the possibility of being unable to investigate the responsibility of the parties involved, unlike the national event.

The actual situation of the financial burden for the provision of international public goods must be understood in this case, there are many issues that must be addressed, such as clarifying the context of aid, the clarification of international public goods and household goods Public inaction and comparison of corrective measures against Misappropriation in the international public, and understanding of the costs related to international public goods between government spending.

In order to have a view on the effectiveness of the provision of international public goods in the future, the relationship between solidarity, representation and expenses must be clarified, and the ideal of creativity and mutual understanding based on the principle of fairness are required.